Transformation of recalcitrant species
Cereals, legumes, and woody plants are commonly categorized as recalcitrant to
transformation. However, the hypothesis that some plants lack the biological
capacity to respond to essential triggers for integrative transformation, or have
cellular mechanisms preventing integrative transformation, can effectively be
rejected. Broadly applicable selection methods are well established and the key
to transform recalcitrant species appears to be the development of methods to
expose many regenerable cells to nondestructive gene transfer treatments.
Knowledge of the relative susceptibility of different cells and tissues to
transformation by
Agrobacterium tumefaciens, would be helpful in devising
strategies for transformation experiments for recalcitrant plant species. Although
we know much about the contribution of the bacterium, we know little about its
interaction with the plant cell and about the events surrounding gene transfer. It
is known that
Agrobacterium DNA transfer is highly regulated and is triggered
only in the presence of susceptible cells of the plant host. However, does
Agrobacterium select between cell types? What features determine favored cells
for gene transfer? Are there physiological requirements for efficient T-DNA
integration? Can wound response of recalcitrant plant species efficiently induce
the expression of vir genes existing in the Ti plasmid of
Agrobacterium?
A clear understanding of the factors determining the amenability of the
transformed cells for regeneration will also favorably contribute to overcome the
problem of transforming recalcitrant species. Despite a vast lore of information
on hormonal control, largely arrived at through trial and error, knowledge of the
fundamental biology underlying induction of plant regeneration and
organogenesis remains scanty.
For example, gene expression associated with
organ-specific inductive events is poorly characterized and the mechanism(s) by
which growth factors such as auxins and cytokinins act to induce organogenesis
is still a mystery. In a developmental perspective, it has been suggested that
plant tissues are composed of cell populations with different states of
developmental competence. [86] Although this implies that cells belonging to
different populations have different fates, the major issue remains as to the
molecular characterization of the different developmental states of the cell and
the determination of organogenic ‘markers’. Additionally, what makes a cell
competent for dedifferentiation, proliferation and regeneration?
Protocols aimed to avoid long tissue culture- and hormone-dependent
regeneration processes have been developed which are based on the natural
capability of plants for spontaneous regeneration. These protocols, which are
characterized by the requirement of a limited number of plant manipulations,
proved to be successful for the stable transformation of plants acting as
important model systems in fundamental research (ie.
Arabidopsis thaliana, [87]
and for the transformation of crops such as tomato. [88] These protocols should be
applicable for the genetic engineering of recalcitrant plant species such as bell
pepper where transformation, [89–91]) has been limited because of the difficulties
of developing an efficient and universal plant regeneration system. The
regeneration of bell pepper has been performed using empirically determined
combinations of growth regulators. [92–6] However, protocols for spontaneous
plant regeneration have been applied to different cultivars of bell pepper which
proved to be efficient. [97–9] Some of these protocols, combined with
Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated gene transfer and selection, have been
shown to be effective in regenerating stable transformed plants of tomato and
they are also promising tools to transform bell pepper.