In situ Bioremediation
bioremediation is the clean up approach which directly involves the contact between microorganisms and the dissolved and sorbed contaminants for biotransformation (Bouwer and Zehnder, 1993). Biotransformation in the surface environment is a very complex process. Potential advantages of in situ
bioremediation methods include minimal site disruption, simultaneous treatment of contaminated soil and ground water, minimal exposure of public and site personnel, and low costs. But the disadvantages are (i)
time consuming method as compared to other remedial methods, (ii)
seasonal vatiation of microbial activity resulting from direct exposure to prevailing environmental factors, and lack of control of these factors, and (iii)
problematic application of treatment additives (nutrients, surfactants and oxygen) (Christodoultos and Kontsospyros, 1998). The microorganisms act well only when the waste materials help them to generate energy and nutrients to build up more cells. When the native microorganisms lack biodegradation capacity, genetically engineered microorganisms (GEMs) may be added to the surface during in situ
bioremediation. But stimulation of indigenous microorganisms is preferred over addition of GEMs. There are two types of in situ
bioremediation: intrinsic and engineered in situ
Conversion of environmental pollutants into the harmless forms through the innate capabilities of naturally occurring microbial population is called intrinsic bioremediation. However, there is increasing interest on intrinsic bioremediation for control of all or some of the contamination at waste sites. The intrinsic i.e.
inherent capacity of microorganisms to metabolize the contaminants should be tested at laboratory and field levels before use for intrinsic bioremediation. Through site monitoring programmes progress of intrinsic bioremediation should be recorded time to time. The conditions of site that favor intrinsic bioremediation are ground water flow throughout the year, carbonate minerals to buffer acidity produced during biodegradation, supply of electron acceptors and nutrients for microbial growth and absence of toxic compounds. The other environmental factors such as pH, concentration, temperature and nutrient availability determine whether or not biotransformation takes place. Bioremediation of waste mixtures containing metals such as Hg, Pb, As and cyanide at toxic concentration can create problem (Madsen, 1991).
The ability of surface bacteria to degrade a given mixture of pollutants in ground water is dependent on the type and concentration of compounds, electron acceptor and duration of bacteria exposed to contamination. Therefore, ability of indigenous bacteria degrading contaminants can be determined in laboratory by plate count and microcosm studies.
Engineered in situ Bioremediation
Fig. 21.1. Surface treatment using above-ground reactor, injection of oxygen, acid nutrient and extraction walls.
Intrinsic bioremediation is satisfactory at some places, but it is slow process due to poorly adapted microorganisms, limited ability of electron acceptor and nutrients, cold temperature and high concentration of contaminants. When site conditions are not suitable, bioremediation requires construction of engineered systems to supply materials that stimulate microorganisms. Engineered in situ
bioremediation accelerates the desired biodegradation reactions by encouraging growth of more microorganisms via optimizing physico-chemical conditions (Bouwer et al,
1998). Oxygen and electron acceptors (e.g.
) and nutrients (e.g.
nitrogen and phosphorus) promote microbial growth in surface.
When contamination is deeper, amended water is injected through wells. But in some in situ
bioremediation systems both extraction and injection wells are used in combination to control the flow of contaminated ground water combined with above-ground bioreactor treatment and subsequent reinjection of nutrients spiked effluent are done (Fig. 21.1).