C4-Ization of C3 Plants
Water equilibrated at normal atmospheric pressure dissolves 11-µM CO
2, which
forms 110-µM HCO
3- at pH 7.2 and 25 °C (Yokota and Kitaoka, 1985). While
RuBisCO fixes CO
2, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) uses HCO
3- as
the substrate. This characteristic confers a tremendous advantage to C
4 plants.
Since the
Km for HCO
3- of maize PEPC is as low as 20 mM (Uedan and Sugiyama,
1976), this enzyme can exhibit submaximal activity in the mesophyll cytosol.
In the case of the C
4 plant maize, oxalacetate formed by PEPC in mesophyll cells
is reduced to malate and then decarboxylated by NADP
+ -dependent malic
enzyme in the mitochondria of bundle sheath cells to give rise to CO
2 and
pyruvate (Heldt, 1997; Kanai and Edwards, 1999). Pyruvate returns to mesophyll
chloroplasts to be salvaged to phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) by pyruvate Pi
dikinase (PPDK). The active operation of this pathway can convert HCO
3- in
mesophyll cytosol to CO
2 concentrated in bundle sheath cells. The CO
2 concentration
around RuBisCO in chloroplasts of bundle sheath cells reaches 500 µM
(von Caemmerer and Furbank, 1999), causing net CO
2 fixation to be saturated at
10–15 Pa CO
2 without any detectable photorespiration (Edwards and Walker,
1983). Thus, this auxiliary metabolic CO
2-pumping system confers significantly
better nitrogen investment and water-use efficiencies to C
4 plants compared with
C
3 plants. If this CO
2-pumping system could be introduced into C
3 plants, the
transgenic plants would be expected to show highly improved photosynthetic
performance and productivity (Ku
et al., 1996).
The maize PEPC gene has been introduced into rice chloroplasts (Ku
et al.,
1999). Although the severalfold higher PEPC activity in chloroplasts did not
influence carbon metabolism (Häusler
et al., 2002), transgenic plants expressing
over 50 times more PEPC activity than wild type exhibited slightly higher
CO
2-fixation rates that were relatively insensitive to O
2 (Ku
et al., 1999). The
primary CO
2-fixation product in these transgenic plants was PGA, not C
4 acid
(Fukayama
et al., 2000). However, the introduction of single C
4 genes will not
establish a metabolic CO
2-pumping system since this transgenic rice depends on
glycolysis for the supply of PEP (Matsuoka
et al., 2001). Maize malic enzyme
and PPDK have been individually introduced into rice plants, but positive
effects on photosynthesis have not been observed (Fukayama
et al., 2001;
Tsuchida
et al., 2001). One unexplained consequence of the ectopic expression of
the maize NADP
+ -malic enzyme in C
3 chloroplasts has been either the lack or
disturbance of grana, possibly indicating altered protein–protein interactions (Takeuchi
et al., 2000). The incorporation of both PEPC and PPDK into rice,
generated by crossing of single-gene transformants, has been achieved and the
plants appeared to behave in a more C
4-like fashion (Ku
et al., 2001). Introduction
of more than two C
4 genes into C
3 plants has not yet been attempted.
Unlike C
4 plants, C
3 plants transgenic for all three genes may not fix CO
2 efficiently since the diffusion of CO
2 in cytosol and through membranes is rapid.
An observation that seems to support this prediction is that cyanobacteria concentrate
HCO
3- within cells to a level up to 10
3 times higher than the ambient CO
2 concentration (Kaplan and Reinhold, 1999). The genes for the CO
2-pumping
systems have been identified (Shibata
et al., 2002). Endogenous carbonic anhydrase
is localized in carboxysomes where the HCO
3- is dehydrated to CO
2 to be
fixed by RuBisCO (Kaplan and Reinhold, 1999). Induction of a high level of
carbonic anhydrase activity in the cytosolic space caused conversion of HCO
3- into CO
2, which was released from the cells at a rate sufficient to nullify the
pumping activity (Price and Badger, 1989). It will be important to learn more
and understand how such high local concentrations of CO
2 around RuBisCO can
be maintained and possibly engineered into higher plant chloroplasts. In this
context, the C
4-type performance of
Borszczowia aralocaspica (Chenopodiaceae)
from the Gobi desert (Voznesenskaya
et al., 2001) provides another interesting
example. In this plant, RuBisCO and NAD
+ -malic enzyme are localized in chloroplasts
and mitochondria, respectively, and are located at the proximal end of
cells. Chloroplasts reside in the distal part of the cells and contain PPDK, but
not RuBisCO, while PEPC is located throughout the cell. Understanding how
such a spatial arrangement of enzymes is accomplished and maintained will be
important for the recreation of a functional C
4 pathway in C
3 plants.