Molecular farming and therapeutic food
The production of plant-derived biopharmaceutical products is sometimes
named as molecular farming. The word biopharmaceutical is applied to a
naturally occurring or modified polypeptide, protein, DNA or RNA product that
is to be used for therapeutic, prophylacticor
in vivo diagnosticusein humans.
The main categories of biopharmaceutical products are recombinant proteins,
therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, polyclonal antibodies, non-recombinant
proteins and antisense oligonucleotides. Between 1995 and 1999, 15
recombinant proteins, six monoclonal antibodies, two polyclonal antibodies,
two non-recombinant proteins and one antisense oligonucleotide were approved
by the FDA. By mid-2000 there were between 80–90 biopharmaceuticals in
general medical use, and around 500 more were undergoing clinical trials. Major
targets of these compounds include cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and
infectious diseases. Most of these products have been produced in cultured
mammalian cells, bacteria and fungi. Now, the use of plants as alternative
production systems is being evaluated since plants are potentially a cheap source
of recombinant products (Table6.2).
One possible disadvantage of using plants as bioreactors for biopharmaceuticals
is that post-translational modification of synthesised proteins may
differ from mammals. However, these modifications are few compared with the
differences between mammals and microorganisms that have been commonly used as a source of biopharmaceuticals. There is also the risk of impurities in the
plant-derived biopharmaceuticals that may include secondary plant metabolites,
pesticides and herbicides. Such impurities could have a direct toxic effect, could
affect product stability, or could even have immunogenicity leading to allergic
reactions. However, biopharmaceuticals derived from transgenic plants could be
safer than those derived from human cells that could be contaminated by human
pathogens.
|
Table 6.2 Some examples of proteins whose production in various plant species have
been reported (Summarised from Giddings et al., 2000) |
|
|
|
Potential application |
|
Plant |
|
Protein |
|
Vaccines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hepatitis B |
|
Tobacco |
|
Hepatitis B surface antigen |
|
|
|
Cholera |
|
Potato |
|
V. cholerae toxin Ctoxa
and Ctox B subunits |
|
|
|
HIV |
|
Tobacco |
|
HIV epitope (gp120) |
|
|
|
Malaria |
|
Tobacco |
|
Malarial B-cell epitope |
|
Antibodies (single
chain Fv fragments) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production of protein in tubers |
|
Potato |
|
Phytochrome binding scFv |
|
|
|
Treatment of non Hodgkin’s lymphoma |
|
Tobacco |
|
scFv of IgG mouse B-cell lymphoma |
|
|
|
Production of tumour associated marker antigen |
|
Cereals |
|
scFv against carcinoembryogenic antigen |
|
Biopharmaceuticals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anticoagulant |
|
Tobacco |
|
Human protein C |
|
|
|
Anaemia |
|
Tobacco |
|
Human erythopoietin |
|
|
|
Provitamin A deficiency |
|
Rice |
|
Daffodil phytoene synthase |
|
|
|
Hypertension |
|
Tobacco |
|
Angiotensin-1-converting
enzyme |
Transgenic plants have already been developed to produce proteins such as
enkephalines,
α-interferon, human serum albumin, glucocerobrosidase and
granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. These last two are among
the most expensive drugs before their production in plants (Giddings
et al. 2000). Rice plants have been engineered to produe
α-l-antitrypsin and the
product is presently under trial (Giddings
et al., 2000). In one case the human
somatotropin has been reported to be produced in the chloroplast of a non-food
crop such as tobacco (Staub
et al., 2000) claiming the additional advantage of
biological containment in the field cultivation of this plant.
Among possible proteins to be produced in transgenic plants there have been
great efforts to produce antibodies whose therapeutic potential has been largely
recognised. Functional antibodies have already been produced in plants and
sometimes have been named as plantibodies. Plants have been successfully used
to generate complex secretory antibodies that would be of particular benefit for
topical immunotherapy in mucoses. This is the case with the production of
humanised monoclonal antibodies for immunoprotection against genital herpes
(Zeitlin
et al., 1998). Moreover, the use of edible plant parts as a source of
antibodies opens the door to the possibility of treatment of the mucoses of the
gastrointestinal tract.
The development of plants expressing vaccine antigens is another relatively new
potential application of plant biotechnology. Vaccines consisting of macromolecules
with a protective immune response has a limited use in developing
countries, mainly owing to their high cost and low stability. The low requirements
of growing plants make their production much cheaper. The expression of vaccines
in plant tissues also eliminates the risk of contamination with animal pathogens,
make them more stable, and may allow oral delivery if expressed in edible parts of
the plants. The first clinical trial with a plant-derived vaccine in 1997 demonstrated
the induction of a mucose immune response (Tacket
et al., 1998). Potatoes
genetically modified to produce a cholera toxin B subunit has been shown to induce
antibody production in humans after oral administration (Arakawa
et al., 1998).
Also, in preclinical animal trials, mice fed with transgenic potato expressing
hepatitis B surface antigen results in a primary immune response (Richter
et al.,
2000). More recently, three plant synthesised antigens of cholera, rotavirus and
enterotoxigenic
E. coli were expressed in potato and showed a strong immune
response in potato-fed mice (Yu and Langridge, 2001). Since it is well documented
that delivery of plant-derived vaccine to a mucosal site induces both local and
systemic immune responses, the list of plant-derived vaccinogens continues to
grow, and includes viral, bacterial, enteric and non-enteric antigens.