Changes in gene frequencies
We have already learnt that gene frequencies are conserved from one generation to the other under certain conditions. We also learnt that under these conditions frequencies of genotypes reach an equilibrium after a single generation of random mating. The conditions include absence of mutations, selection, migration and. random drift. We know that these conditions are never fulfilled. Therefore, in a large panmictic (random mating) population, changes in gene frequencies do occur. This change can either be directional as in the case of mutation, selection or migration, or can be nondirectional as in the cases of random drift. The directional change means a change of gene frequencies progressively from one value to another in either direction. If this change is not checked, the forces may lead to eventual fixation of one allele, all other alleles being eliminated. Similarly, the non-directional change means changes which can not be predicted from one generation to the other. The changes in gene frequencies due to different individual factors will be discussed separately.
Mutations lead to introduction of new genes leading to genetic differences. These new genes introduced due to mutations may or may not persist depending upon their utility. The gene frequencies will alpo depend upon this factor. A change in gene frequencies due to mutations will depend upon mutation rate. This can be illustrated with the help of a hypothetical example. If a dominant gene 'A' mutates to 'a' with no reverse mutation, then frequency of 'a' will eventually replace 'A', if constant mutation rate persists for a long time in a population of constant size. Quantitatively, let 'p0' be the initial frequency of 'A' and 'u' be the mutation rate with which 'A' changes to 'a'. In such a case, 'a' will appear with a frequency of u x p0in the first generation. The frequency of 'A' will, therefore, be reduced by a factor p0u and become p0-p0u = p0(l-u). In the next generation there will be further change due to the change of 'A' to 'a' thus further reducing the frequency of 'A' by a factor p0(l-u) x u, so that the earlier frequency p0(l-u)will now become p0(l-u) -p0(l-u) x u = p0(l-u)(l-u) = p0(l-u)2. In this manner, in 'n' generations, the frequency of 'A' will be reduced to p0(l-u)n. Eventually, even if the value of u is small, the term (l-u)n will approach zero so that 'A' will disappear after several generations, if no reverse mutation takes place and the mutant allele experiences no selection pressure against it.
u |
u + v |
In the same way, the expected frequency of 'A', i.e. p^ will be equal to
v |
u + v |
In other words, p^/q^=
v |
u |
, and with u = v the equilibrium frequencies p and q will be equal (i.e. p = q = 0.5, because p + q = 1). But the rate of achievement of equilibrium frequencies is quite slow, and can be obtained from the formula, (u+v)n = loge {(q0-q^)/(qn-q^)}, where n is the number of generations required to reach a frequency qn with an initial frequency of q0, and e = 2.1718 (loge = 2.303 log10).