Strategies to Improve Salt Tolerance by Modulating Ion Homeostasis
Discoveries about the identity and function of salt stress signaling components
and the transport proteins that mediate Na
+ homeostasis make it possible to
propose strategies for the biotechnological improvement of crops with high probability
to increase yield stability in saline environments encountered in cultivated
agriculture. Strategies include regulating salt stress signal pathway(s) to be constitutively
active or more responsive to stress or modulating effector activity or
efficacy. Constitutive activation of the
sos pathway is achievable by modifying
the
sos2 kinase through deletion of its autoinhibitory domain or site-specific
modifications to the catalytic region, or by ectopic inducible coexpression of
sos3/
sos2 (Gaxiola
et al., 2001; Quintero
et al., 2002; Talke
et al., 2003). Presumably,
the
sos signal pathway modulation can be engineered to enhance the salt
adaptation capacity of plants. Another approach is the coordinate control of net
Na
+ flux across the plasma membrane and vacuolar compartmentalization. Other
yet unidentified salt adaptation determinants that are outputs of the
sos pathway
could also be positively affected (Zhu, 2003).
Obviously, overexpression of the putative sodium/proton antiporter AtNHX1
also enhances plant salt tolerance, possibly by increasing vacuolar Na
+ compartmentalization
that minimizes the toxic accumulation of the ion in the cytosol
and facilitates growth in the saline environment (Apse
et al., 1999; Zhang and
Blumwald, 2001; Zhang
et al., 2001). The authors report that in the NHX overexpressing
tomato plants, Na
+ is not accumulating in all organs, which might
indicate that the altered Na
+ flux could initiate yet other mechanisms, possibly
influencing other ion transporters. Furthermore, overexpression of
sos1 increases
salt tolerance of
Arabidopsis (Shi
et al., 2003). These results indicate that regulating
net Na
+ influx across the plasma membrane together with enhancing the capacity
for vacuolar compartmentalization should substantially facilitate Na
+ homeostasis
and salt tolerance. With current understanding, this is achievable by modulating
the expression or activity of
sos1 (Na
+ efflux) and/or HKT1 (Na
+ influx) at
the plasma membrane, as well as modulating the activity of the vacuolar Na
+ /H
+ antiporter and/or H
+ pump (Rubio
et al., 1995; Vitart
et al., 2001; Zhu, 2003).
Future molecular genetic resources for bioengineering of salt tolerance
include alleles that encode transport determinants with greater capacity to
mediate Na
+ homeostasis. Halophytes are a potential germplasm resource.
Alternatively, new alleles may be generated by directed molecular evolution.
For example, mutant variant forms of HKT1 transport more K
+ at the expense of
Na
+ and render greater salt tolerance (Cheeseman, 1988; Rubio
et al., 1999)
Promoters that direct the tissue- and/or inducer-specific regulation of target
genes can condition the expression of the signal intermediates and the effectors.
Thus regulation of the numerous salt tolerance determinants can be coordinated
for an effective plant response but much of the cost associated with salt tolerance
in nature might be minimized because some essential evolutionary necessities
can be compensated for by agricultural practices.
Again, halophytes may be
natural resources or synthetic promoters will be constructed. Apart from the
sos cascade, it is presumed that yet other salt adaptation signal regulatory
pathways exist that await discovery and dissection. Conceivably of equally
critical importance are growth and development pathways that perceive and
interact with salinity perception and response, and are modulated by salt to
affect yield stability. In this respect, the redistribution of sodium along the xylem
stream from root to reproductive organs could become an avenue for additional
intervention. The capacity to short-circuit effects of increasing Na
+ on growth
and development will require a clear understanding about how and why environmental
perturbation has such a negative impact on processes required for
crop production.